TechCrunch vs. Mashable – 10 Tips For Evaluating Your Competitors

If you’re thinking about starting a company or you are already involved with one but want to understand your market better, you’ll want to evaluate your actual or potential competitors.

There are three components to a good competitive analysis: (1) defining the metrics and identifying the competitors you’re comparing, (2) gathering the data, and (3) the analysis.

How do you begin? What are the relevant factors that you should be comparing? And what conclusions can/should you draw from the data?

Below, I offer 10 tips (from my own experience) for evaluating your competitors. I’ll illustrate by using TechCruch and Mashable as an example. Keep in mind that this post isn’t intended to be the complete guide to competitive analysis. I wanted to share a bit of what I’ve learned and to help you build a foundation.

TechCrunch, according to its About page, is a “weblog dedicated to obsessively profiling and reviewing new Internet products and companies. In addition to covering new companies, we profile existing companies that are making an impact (commercial and/or cultural) on the new web space.”

Mashable, according to its About page, “is the world’s largest blog focused exclusively on Web 2.0 and Social Media news. With more than 7 million monthly pageviews, Mashable is the most prolific blog reviewing new Web sites and services, publishing breaking news on what’s new on the web and offering social media resources and guides.”

Let’s assume that you want to compare TechCrunch and Mashable. Here we go:

1. Define WHAT metrics are important. Before you start looking at data, you must understand what metrics are meaningful to your comparison. Are you interested in comparing revenues? Unique visitors? Total visits? Traffic rank? Pick a set of metrics that are important to you and measure the data based on those metrics.

Don’t worry if you’re not sure whether you’ve defined all of the relevant metrics. As you start looking at the data, you’ll no doubt see other good comparisons.

2. Look at recent trends. In the past two months, Mashable has overtaken TechCrunch in unique visitors, as reported by http://www.compete.com
3 months

Recent trends are important because they paint a picture of what’s happening now. Based on this recent data, Mashable appears to be growing at a slightly faster rate than TechCrunch. But has this been historically true – say for the past year?

[Read more...]

Are We Becoming A Little Less Human Online?

2676960860_fa358c04a1_oI’ve been watching the TV series HEROES. The show is about people but with special abilities – flight, invisibility, ability to predict the future, melting solid objects, instant healing from any injury, and many more – who live among the normal population.

During one of the episodes.  Claire Bennet, a high school cheerleader who can instantly heal from any injury, loses her ability to feel pain. Pain was one of the few things that made Claire feel human.

After I watched that episode, I started thinking about my own experiences – offline and online – and about the many ways in which many of us are just a little less human when we’re online. Part of the problem lies in the medium – we can’t usually see the people we’re talking to online, and that makes our conversations a bit more detached and impersonal. We send @ messages on Twitter, post updates on Facebook, send emails and direct messages, and think of those activities as conversations. And they are indeed conversations – through these conversations, we learn, share, teach, laugh, discuss, debate, etc.

But as we continue to become a society that spends increasing amounts of time looking at a computer, are we losing a bit of emotion with each conversation? In the quest for popularity and followers and/or  friends, are we losing perspective? Are we more likely to forget when we’re online that harsh words and criticism can hurt others? And we quicker to judge others when we have the cloak of invisibility surrounding our online activities? And is this trend impacting our offline relationships too?

What do you think?

Image credit: 파파곰

Plan For Unpredictability

3329713552_da4c3d03c8_bThe fictional law firm on “The Practice” (on television from 1997 to 2004)  was notorious for relying on “Plan B” – which involved creating doubt with the jury about their client’s guilt by accusing a third (usually innocent) party of the crime.

While most of us don’t represent criminals – we could all benefit from developing a “Plan B” (or several) when we create strategy or make decisions.

Having a “Plan B” is important because while you can make educated assumptions about the future, you cannot guarantee that the future will unfold just like you predicted. You won’t always be able to stop and decide what to do after your plans fall apart. (Incidentally, the belief about whether the future is predictable vs. controlable is one key difference between MBAs and entrepreneurs).

For example, if you assume a certain level of revenue from your business and your revenues are much smaller than you anticipated, you might not have the ability to adjust once you’ve run out of money. So don’t just assess the most likely scenario – take the time when you initially plan to develop a best and worst case scenario too.

And importantly, don’t just think about a “Plan B” – think also about how you will implement it. That way, you’ll rarely be surprised when things don’t turn out the way you planned – they rarely do – and you’ll be always ready to react in a meaningful and thoughtful way.

Do you develop a “Plan B” when you make decisions? How do you prepare for the possibility that your plans/strategy may need to change?

Image credit: 1suisse