<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 19:14:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-3856</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter&#8217;s New Ad Policy And The Dangers Of Tying Your Business To Another &#171; crowdSPRING Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 07:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-3856</guid>
		<description>[...] who read my personal blog might recall that I wrote about this issue back in November 2009 &#8211; Social Media Insiders Fiddle While Twitter Burns. I am not a fan of in-stream advertising &#8211; here&#8217;s what I wrote then: In-stream ads are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who read my personal blog might recall that I wrote about this issue back in November 2009 &#8211; Social Media Insiders Fiddle While Twitter Burns. I am not a fan of in-stream advertising &#8211; here&#8217;s what I wrote then: In-stream ads are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-754</link>
		<dc:creator>The Case for In-Stream Advertising &#124; CloudAve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 06:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-754</guid>
		<description>[...] whether in-stream advertising has heated up.&#160; I just read well written pieces on the topic by Ross Kimbarovsky, Robert Scoble, Paul Carr and the NY Times.&#160; I myself recently covered the topic when I spoke [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whether in-stream advertising has heated up.&nbsp; I just read well written pieces on the topic by Ross Kimbarovsky, Robert Scoble, Paul Carr and the NY Times.&nbsp; I myself recently covered the topic when I spoke [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-732</guid>
		<description>Douglas - I agree that expectations are important. I&#039;m not sure that it makes sense for Twitter to charge for API access until users of Twitter&#039;s API are able to monetize their own activities. Of course, as is true of in-stream ads, that already appears to be happening so nothing stops Twitter from requiring revenue sharing (if they allowed such practices to continue).

Interesting thoughts about analytics. Radian6 is a broad product - I wonder if such a purchase would cause Twitter to lose focus - they&#039;ve done a pretty good job patiently keeping their eyes on the road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douglas &#8211; I agree that expectations are important. I&#8217;m not sure that it makes sense for Twitter to charge for API access until users of Twitter&#8217;s API are able to monetize their own activities. Of course, as is true of in-stream ads, that already appears to be happening so nothing stops Twitter from requiring revenue sharing (if they allowed such practices to continue).</p>
<p>Interesting thoughts about analytics. Radian6 is a broad product &#8211; I wonder if such a purchase would cause Twitter to lose focus &#8211; they&#8217;ve done a pretty good job patiently keeping their eyes on the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media Insiders Fiddle While Twitter Burns Search Engine Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-725</guid>
		<description>[...] post: Social Media Insiders Fiddle While Twitter Burns          By admin &#124; category: search advertising &#124; tags: client, clients-incorporate, edition, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post: Social Media Insiders Fiddle While Twitter Burns          By admin | category: search advertising | tags: client, clients-incorporate, edition, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media Insiders Fiddle While Twitter Burns &#124; twitteradvertisingandmarketingtools.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-723</guid>
		<description>[...] More here: Social Media Insiders Fiddle While Twitter Burns [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More here: Social Media Insiders Fiddle While Twitter Burns [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>The Case for In-Stream Advertising &#171; The SiliconANGLE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-721</guid>
		<description>[...] whether in-stream advertising has heated up.&#160; I just read well written pieces on the topic by Ross Kimbarovsky, Robert Scoble, Paul Carr and the NY Times.&#160; I myself recently covered the topic when I spoke [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whether in-stream advertising has heated up.&#160; I just read well written pieces on the topic by Ross Kimbarovsky, Robert Scoble, Paul Carr and the NY Times.&#160; I myself recently covered the topic when I spoke [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-720</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all about expectations.  I&#039;ve always been surprised that Twitter didn&#039;t charge for API access to its data.  I believe that would &#039;thin the herd&#039; of useless applications that are burying Twitter in API calls.

If Twitter is able to set an expectation with a client on whether or not an ad arises, it will probably educate the user to ignore it and impact might plummet.  I&#039;d rather see Twitter build a very robust monitoring and response engine... perhaps buying Radian6... so that companies can be alerted and can respond when their companies, products, services or people are mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all about expectations.  I&#8217;ve always been surprised that Twitter didn&#8217;t charge for API access to its data.  I believe that would &#8216;thin the herd&#8217; of useless applications that are burying Twitter in API calls.</p>
<p>If Twitter is able to set an expectation with a client on whether or not an ad arises, it will probably educate the user to ignore it and impact might plummet.  I&#8217;d rather see Twitter build a very robust monitoring and response engine&#8230; perhaps buying Radian6&#8230; so that companies can be alerted and can respond when their companies, products, services or people are mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-719</guid>
		<description>Russ and Stuart - I&#039;m not certain that in-stream advertising, at least as currently implemented by companies like Ad.ly, is a monetization strategy for Twitter. At the moment, Twitter makes NO money from those services. Twitter could turn around and require those services to share revenue, or pay fees to Twitter, but that hasn&#039;t happened and it&#039;s unclear whether it will.

Stuart - what does in-stream advertising look like on DIGG? Is it in the comments or in the stream of the posts that people vote on? Would you say the user experience on DIGG is an analog to that on Twitter? That&#039;s where I&#039;d focus and I see the experience on the two networks (and the people who use them), vastly different.

James - I agree that Twitter ultimately needs a revenue model. Clearly, they&#039;ve decided for the moment to focus on growth and not revenue (history will tell whether they made the right choice. Google did the same thing at one point).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ and Stuart &#8211; I&#8217;m not certain that in-stream advertising, at least as currently implemented by companies like Ad.ly, is a monetization strategy for Twitter. At the moment, Twitter makes NO money from those services. Twitter could turn around and require those services to share revenue, or pay fees to Twitter, but that hasn&#8217;t happened and it&#8217;s unclear whether it will.</p>
<p>Stuart &#8211; what does in-stream advertising look like on DIGG? Is it in the comments or in the stream of the posts that people vote on? Would you say the user experience on DIGG is an analog to that on Twitter? That&#8217;s where I&#8217;d focus and I see the experience on the two networks (and the people who use them), vastly different.</p>
<p>James &#8211; I agree that Twitter ultimately needs a revenue model. Clearly, they&#8217;ve decided for the moment to focus on growth and not revenue (history will tell whether they made the right choice. Google did the same thing at one point).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-718</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-718</guid>
		<description>Having seen in-stream advertising and what it looks like on services like Digg? I have absolutely no problem with this what so ever. Just call it out as an ad and everyone will be happy.

Twitter needs a business model. This sort of gets them 1/4 of the way there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having seen in-stream advertising and what it looks like on services like Digg? I have absolutely no problem with this what so ever. Just call it out as an ad and everyone will be happy.</p>
<p>Twitter needs a business model. This sort of gets them 1/4 of the way there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media Insiders Fiddle While Twitter Burns&#160;&#124;&#160;Trendo24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-717</guid>
		<description>[...] Go here to read the rest: Social Media Insiders Fiddle While Twitter Burns [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Go here to read the rest: Social Media Insiders Fiddle While Twitter Burns [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>The Case for In-Stream Advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-715</guid>
		<description>[...] of whether in-stream advertising has heated up.  I just read well written pieces on the topic by Ross Kimbarovsky, Robert Scoble, Paul Carr and the NY Times.  I myself recently covered the topic when I spoke [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of whether in-stream advertising has heated up.  I just read well written pieces on the topic by Ross Kimbarovsky, Robert Scoble, Paul Carr and the NY Times.  I myself recently covered the topic when I spoke [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>James Gill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-714</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve raised some interesting points here Ross. I agree - I think Twitter will severely suffer if they sell out by allowing anyone to post tweets with the motive of making a quick buck.

On the other hand, you made the point of Google keeping AdWords clearly separated from organic search results, what if Twitter were to introduce a form of advertising system akin to the implementation of ads within Tweetie on the Mac and Twitterrific on iPhone where every 50 or so tweets is broken by a targeted ad placement? What if Twitter were to implement a similar strategy to earn revenue for themselves, perhaps ignoring (for now) the need for users to monetize their stream?

I&#039;m in the mind that this may not be the best strategy right now - despite Twitter&#039;s rapid expansion into the mainstream, is everyone going to put up with ads in their stream regardless of where they consume it?

The obvious opportunity that would evolve from this would be for Twitter to charge for &quot;Pro&quot; accounts of some form which would allow for users to opt out of receiving ads.

Perhaps these aren&#039;t the best ideas for Twitter&#039;s future right now though - I can see the backlash they would cause already, but they&#039;re gonna need to bring some revenue in some day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve raised some interesting points here Ross. I agree &#8211; I think Twitter will severely suffer if they sell out by allowing anyone to post tweets with the motive of making a quick buck.</p>
<p>On the other hand, you made the point of Google keeping AdWords clearly separated from organic search results, what if Twitter were to introduce a form of advertising system akin to the implementation of ads within Tweetie on the Mac and Twitterrific on iPhone where every 50 or so tweets is broken by a targeted ad placement? What if Twitter were to implement a similar strategy to earn revenue for themselves, perhaps ignoring (for now) the need for users to monetize their stream?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in the mind that this may not be the best strategy right now &#8211; despite Twitter&#8217;s rapid expansion into the mainstream, is everyone going to put up with ads in their stream regardless of where they consume it?</p>
<p>The obvious opportunity that would evolve from this would be for Twitter to charge for &#8220;Pro&#8221; accounts of some form which would allow for users to opt out of receiving ads.</p>
<p>Perhaps these aren&#8217;t the best ideas for Twitter&#8217;s future right now though &#8211; I can see the backlash they would cause already, but they&#8217;re gonna need to bring some revenue in some day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Order Ambien Without A Prescription - HQ Pharmacy</title>
		<link>http://rosskimbarovsky.com/2009/11/social-media-insiders-fiddle-while-twitter-burns/comment-page-1/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosskimbarovsky.com/?p=446#comment-713</guid>
		<description>I think Twitter&#039;s going to make money in how they &quot;open up&quot; to the world access to their data beyond the APIs (that is, they really limit how far back you can go, etc.).  I think in-stream advertising won&#039;t be a big enough draw in comparison, but a subscription to that data stream? Yum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Twitter&#8217;s going to make money in how they &#8220;open up&#8221; to the world access to their data beyond the APIs (that is, they really limit how far back you can go, etc.).  I think in-stream advertising won&#8217;t be a big enough draw in comparison, but a subscription to that data stream? Yum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
